I have written on this
blog before that when you reach Santiago you stop being a Pilgrim and start
being a tourist but what is the difference between the two?
I remember reading in an
albergue somewhere that, ‘The tourist demands, the pilgrim accepts’. It is true
that I do not count my pilgrimages to Santiago as a holiday in the usual sense
but I do do ‘touristy’ things. Some of these are Pilgrim things such as
visiting Leon Cathedral but others cannot be seen as Pilgrim activities (for
example going to the Roman museum in Astorga).
A tourist though only goes
to a place to see the sights, a person who travels or visits a place for
pleasure whereas a pilgrim, although they will see the sights whilst they are
there, is moving toward a destination (be it Santiago, Rome or elsewhere).
Possibly a pilgrim becomes
more immersed in the culture they are in as well, or at least in the culture of
the trail, than a tourist will as albergues are usually in the middle of the
town and hotels are sometimes in areas that become almost tourist enclaves.
Having walked the Camino,
Pilgrims Way and non pilgrimage routes in the Hadrian’s Wall path and the Coast
to Coast route I do think that I felt differently on each although I cannot
define how. Maybe it had more to do with the people I met on pilgrimage, the
welcome that is received by the Pilgrim on The Way from other walkers as well
as the local people was more open and friendly than on the other routes as well
as the knowledge that the pilgrimage routes I am walking because of my faith
and not as a ends in itself.
Is it therefore the
attitude of yourself as a pilgrim and those around you which defines if you are
a pilgrim or a tourist or is it something else I have not thought of here, let
me know your thoughts.
Comments
Post a Comment