'The Way' is a 2010 film
staring Martin Sheen and directed by his son Emilio Estervez. It is about Tom
(Sheen) who goes to Saint Jean Pied du Port to recover the body of his
estranged son after he died on the first day walking on the Camino. Tom then
decides to walk the Camino, scattering the ashes of his son as he goes. As he
walks he makes friends with three other pilgrims: Joost from Amsterdam (Yorick
van Wageningen), Sarah from Canada (Deborah Kara Unger) and Jack from Ireland
(James Nesbitt). Together they walk to Santiago and then finish in Muxia.
How far though is this
film an accurate representation of the Camino experience?
The camaraderie that Tom
experiences is something that is to be found on the Camino – the way that you
meet fellow pilgrims and just start to walk with them is accurate in my
experience, Pilgrims do quickly make friends and do just meet up and walk
together for the rest of their Camino. There is a removal of barriers on the
Camino so that no-one cares what country you are from or what your job or age
is, you are all pilgrims and therefore share enough in common to be friends.
Spain’s landscape is shown
very well – its beauty is clear as is its variety as you walk along the Camino.
The food of the Camino is
also shown (although I have never seen pilgrims be allowed to completely
prepare a meal, I have seen them assist the hospiteleros though) but those
meals (just a very few of the Pilgrim Menus) that are vile are not shown at
all.
The historic buildings of
the Camino is seen but not discussed whereas it is made clear that the Camino
is an ancient pilgrim trail.
Some people on the Camino
do walk for faith and some do not. Tom is shown as a lapsed catholic who may
have re-found his faith by the end of the film and the Priest is shown walking
hoping for a miracle as Pilgrims in Mediaeval times did. The other three of our
Pilgrims do not walk with faith at all (so ¾ Pilgrims walk with no Christian
faith which may be accurate).
The generosity of those on
the Camino is shown – Tom helps one of the other pilgrims when they have
something in their eye and Joost is willing to share his food with Tom (and his
drugs, that isn’t something that I have ever seen happen on Camino though).
Walking becomes very
important to the group of Pilgrims as it does to those who are on Camino – all
but Tom are certain that they will stop in Santiago and yet continue to Muxia.
However there are parts
that are not accurate – the way that the bags are lifted make it obvious that
there is nothing in them. It would have been easy surely to add a bit of weight
to them?
Injuries, be they blisters
are something more serious, are common on Camino and yet this is missed out,
there is a brief discussion about the ‘difficulties of the Way’ but these are
not shown.
The characters do not wear technical walking clothes as the large majority of Pilgrims do – jeans are worn which dry slowly and are uncomfortable to wear when
wet and are heavy, I have met one Pilgrim who took jeans on Camino with him
thinking that he would wear them at night but he soon gave them away to a
hospitelero rather than carry them.
Overall the experience of
the Camino is, I feel, seen through rose-tinted glasses with difficulties
ignored in favour of beauty.
Does anyone have any other
points that I have missed? If so add them into the comments.
Comments
Post a Comment